|Year : 2017 | Volume
| Issue : 2 | Page : 43-48
Is there a need to phase out replacement blood donors by voluntary blood donors in hospital based blood transfusion services?
Praneeta Jaswant Singh1, Hitesh Bhatt2
1 Department of Pathology, KD Medical College Hospital and Research Center, Mathura, Uttar Pradesh, India
2 Department of Microbiology, KD Medical College Hospital and Research Center, Mathura, Uttar Pradesh, India
|Date of Submission||10-May-2017|
|Date of Acceptance||21-Jun-2017|
|Date of Web Publication||9-Oct-2017|
Praneeta Jaswant Singh
Department of Pathology, KD Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, NH- 2, Akbarpur, Chatta, Mathura - 281 406, Uttar Pradesh
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Background: Providing safe blood for transfusion is a responsibility of every blood bank. Screening for transfusion-transmissible infections (TTI) is one of the ways to ensure safety of blood and its products. Prevalence of TTI varies in different countries. It is low in developed countries whereas it is higher in developing countries.
Aims And Objectives: This study was carried out to access percentage of blood collected from the first-time voluntary blood donors (VBD) and family/replacement donors (RD) and to access safety of RD by comparing seroprevalence of TTI among voluntary and RD.
Materials And Methods: Over 1 year, donors were studied for the type of donation (voluntary or replacement) made at our blood bank. All donors were screened for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), syphilis, and malaria. Comparison of the prevalence of TTI among voluntary and RD was done by entering data into Microsoft Excel 2007 software and using Chi-square tests.
Results: Out of total 850 first-time donors, voluntary donors were 109 (12.82%) and RD were 741 (87.18%). Overall seroprevalence of HIV, HBV, HCV, syphilis, and malaria was 0, 23 (2.70%), 12 (1.41%), 7 (0.82%), and 0, respectively. Prevalence of TTI among voluntary donors was very low. All donors were seronegative HIV and malaria. Prevalence of HBV, HCV, and syphilis was higher in RD.
Conclusion: Data highlight that RD contributed major source of blood supply in hospital-based blood transfusion services and the prevalence of TTI was higher among them in comparison to first-time voluntary donors. Thus, efforts should be made to increase the number of VBD.
Keywords: Hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus, human immunodeficiency virus, India, replacement donors, voluntary blood donors
|How to cite this article:|
Singh PJ, Bhatt H. Is there a need to phase out replacement blood donors by voluntary blood donors in hospital based blood transfusion services?. Iraqi J Hematol 2017;6:43-8
|How to cite this URL:|
Singh PJ, Bhatt H. Is there a need to phase out replacement blood donors by voluntary blood donors in hospital based blood transfusion services?. Iraqi J Hematol [serial online] 2017 [cited 2021 Jan 16];6:43-8. Available from: https://www.ijhonline.org/text.asp?2017/6/2/43/216219
| Introduction|| |
Blood transfusion services form an integral part of any health-care system and it is responsibility of each nation to ensure adequate supply of safe blood for transfusion. Every blood transfusion has a risk of transmitting blood-borne infections to its recipient. By studying overall prevalence of transfusion-transmissible infections (TTI) among donors, safety of blood and blood products can be accessed. According to the World health organization (WHO) report, risk of transmitting TTI was found to be higher in countries which are dependent on family/replacement or paid donors. The WHO developed a plan of action with a vision to achieve 100% voluntary nonremunerated blood donation throughout the world to reduce the risk of TTIs and provide adequate safe blood for transfusion.
Recently studies from Africa, where replacement donors (RD) form a major source of blood supply (75%–80%), found that RD can be considered as good alternative to altruistic/community blood donors in low-income group countries since cost of collecting blood from RD is cheaper and also blood collected from RD showed no significant difference in the prevalence of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis as compared to voluntary donors., In Brazil, voluntary donors showed higher prevalence of HIV as compared to RD. As opposed to developed countries, risk of TTI among first-time voluntary donors in developing nations was found to be same or higher as compared to RD.,
In India, National Blood Policy has been formed which focuses on phasing out RD and to achieve 100% voluntary blood donation. In 2008, India reported increase in the number of voluntary donors from 3.6 million in 2007 to 4.6 million in a report submitted to the WHO for global data on blood safety. Various studies from different parts of India indicate that many blood banks are still dependent on RD to maintain adequate stock.,,, This indicates that in India implementation of national blood policy is not uniform since blood transfusion services are mainly hospital based and highly decentralized.
In India, it is mandatory to screen donors for HIV 1 and 2, hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), syphilis, and malaria, as per the guidelines of the ministry of health and family welfare, under the Drug and Cosmetic Act 1945.
The present study was carried out with aims to access percentage of blood collected from first-time voluntary and RD and to analyze safety of RD by comparing the prevalence of transfusion-transmissible infectious disease markers among first-time voluntary and RD.
| Materials and Methods|| |
This was a prospective cohort study conducted over 1 year from January 2016 to December 2016, in the blood bank, Department of Pathology, Private Tertiary Care Hospital and Medical College, Uttar Pradesh, North India. This study was approved by hospital's Ethical Committee. All first-time apparently healthy donors above 18 years and below 60 years of age, who fulfilled donor selection criteria, were included in the study. Paid/professional donors were identified and excluded from the study. This study was conducted at a private institution, so voluntary donation was done only at blood bank since in India, private institutes are not allowed to organize community-based camps.
Donors were divided into following categories:
- Voluntary blood donors (VBD): Nonremunerated donors who donated blood on his/her free will without expecting anything in return either in form of cash or kind. They were further subdivided into following two categories:
- Repeat VBD: VBD who donated blood more than once at our blood bank
- First-time VBD: VBD who donated blood for the first time at our blood bank. Only first-time VBD were included in the study.
RD: Apparently healthy donors who were either friends or relatives of the patients and donated blood as per the requirement of their patients without being paid either in cash or kind.
All donors were screened for five transfusion-transmissible infectious agents - HIV, HBV, HCV, syphilis, and malaria by collecting plasma from the pilot tube attached to the blood bag.
ELISA test was applied for detecting anti-HIV-1 and HIV-2, hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), and anti-HCV using the following kits supplied by J Mitra and Co. Pvt. Ltd.:
- HEPALISA: A third-generation microwell ELISA test used for detecting HBsAg
- MICROLISA-HIV: Microwell ELISA test based on indirect ELISA, used for detecting antibodies against envelope antigens gp41, C-terminus of gp120 for HIV-1 and gp36 for HIV-2
- HCV MICROELISA: A third-generation microwell ELISA test detects antibodies against HCV (anti-HCVs) using combination of antigen with the sequence of both HCV structural and nonstructural antigen, that is, CORE, E1, E2, NS3, NS4, and NS5.
All procedures were carried out as per the guidelines provided by the manufacturer. Known positive and negative controls were run with each test.
Repeat test was performed for all the positive samples using same ELISA test kits. Samples that were positive on repeat testing were labeled as positive for respective TTI and were placed separately under discarded blood units.
Screening for syphilis was done using syphilis rapid card test supplied by Beacon diagnostic Pvt Ltd., It detects TP antibody (IgA, IgM, and IgG) using immune chromatography principle.
Test for malaria was done by malascan plus rapid card test supplied by Zephyr biomedicals. It is based on the principle of immunochromatography. It detects the presence of Pan malaria specific pLDH as well as Plasmodium falciparum specific histidine-rich protein (Pf. HRP-2).
Blood bags that were positive for any of the five TTI were properly discarded.
Data entry and analysis were carried out using Microsoft Excel Spreadsheet (version 2007) and seroprevalence of HIV, HBsAg, HCV, and Syphilis was derived. Prevalence of TTIs among replacement and voluntary donors was compared using Chi-square test.
| Results|| |
During the study period of 1 year, from January 2016 to December 2016, data were collected from total 850 apparently healthy VBD and RD (VBD: 109 [12.82%], RD: 741 [87.18%]). A total number of VBD was significantly lower as compared to RD (P = 0.0001).
Number of male donors in both categories of VBD and RD was significantly higher than the female donors [Table 1].
|Table 1: Sex-wise distribution of voluntary blood donors and replacement donors|
Click here to view
A total number of 42 (4.94%) donors were tested positive for TTI. Overall prevalence of HIV, HBV, HCV, syphilis, and malaria was zero, 23 (2.70%), 12 (1.41%), 7 (0.82%), and 0, respectively. HBV was most prevalent TTI.
On comparing the prevalence of TTI among VBD and RD, prevalence of HBV in RD was found to be significantly higher than VBD (P = 0.0021). Prevalence of HCV and syphilis was also higher in RD than VBD, but P value could not be derived [Table 2].
|Table 2: Comparison of prevalence of transfusion-transmissible infections among voluntary blood donors and replacement donors|
Click here to view
On comparing the prevalence of TTI among male and female donors it was found that prevalence of HBV and HCV was higher among male donors while the prevalence of syphilis was higher in female donors. As number of female donors and prevalence of TTI in them was very low, P value was not calculated [Table 3].
|Table 3: Sex-wise distribution of transfusion-transmissible infections among voluntary blood donors and replacement donors|
Click here to view
| Discussion|| |
The most effective way to reduce the prevalence of TTI is self-deferral by donors who find themselves ineligible to donate blood. It is hypothesized that family/RD may hide information related to their health condition or any high-risk behavior due to fear of letting down family members or pressure to save their patient's life, which increases the risk of TTI. Furthermore, it has been observed that in case of emergency patient's relatives may resort to unethical practice of obtaining blood from paid donors by posing them as friend or relatives which further increases the risk of TTI.
Percentage of voluntary and replacement donors
In North India, proportion of voluntary donors varies from 9.1% to 52.3%. In the present study, majority of donors were RD (n = 741, 87.18%) which is comparable to studies from North India by Awasthi et al. (85.19%) and Singh et al. (82.4%). Higher percentage of RD was also reported by a study from Central India by Yadav et al. (92%) and by Chattoraj et al. from Western India.
In contrast to our findings, a study from North India by Arya et al. reported that majority of the blood donors were voluntary donors (87%). Similar finding was also reported by studies from Western India by Patel et al. and Shah et al. as well as by Khamankar et al. from Central India.
Although our national blood policy aims at achieving 100% voluntary blood donation, still significantly large amount of blood is collected from RD in various parts of India. In India, up to November 2012, there were 2545 licensed blood banks out of which 1564 (61.5%) were private blood banks and the remaining 981 (38.5%) were government blood banks. Furthermore, in India, private institutions are not allowed to conduct voluntary blood donation camps outside the blood bank campus whereas government institutions can organize community-based voluntary blood donation camps. According to the strategic management information system data of National AIDS Control Organization in 2012–2013, percentages of voluntary donors were 73%, out of which majority of voluntary donations were done at community-based camps organized outside the blood banks.
The present study was conducted at blood bank of a private tertiary care hospital whereas Arya et al., Patel et al., and Shah et al. carried out their work at government-run blood bank. Arya et al. reported increase in a total number of voluntary donors during their study period due to increase in number of community-based camps. In community-based camps, people are motivated by number of social factors and feel more comfortable in familiar surroundings to donate blood.
Sex-wise distribution of donors
In the present study, number of male donors was significantly higher than female donors. Similar observation was reported by studies from different parts of India.,,,,
Whereas studies from developed countries reported that percentages of female donors were more than male donors., Studies have shown that though women are more motivated to be a voluntary donor, actual number of blood donation done by them is less. This can be explained by high deferral rate among women due to low hemoglobin.,
Prevalence of human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus, syphilis, and malaria among all donors
In the present study, HBV was found to be the most prevalent TTI with a prevalence rate of 2.7% which is comparable to other studies from North India by Awasthi et al. (1.82%), Arya et al. (1.60%), and Kaur et al. (1.7%) as well as studies from Central India by Yadav et al. (1.77%) and Khamankar et al. (3.2%). It is higher as compared to studies from Western India by Patel et al. (0.85%) and Shah et al. (0.97%).
In the present study, HIV seropositivity in all donors was zero. Very low prevalence of HIV among donors was reported by Awasthi et al. (0.1%) and Arya et al. (0.1%) from North India, by Yadav et al. (0.14%) from Central India, and Shah et al. (0.16%) from Western India. While Khamankar et al. from Central India reported higher prevalence rate of HIV (0.92%) among donors. In the present study, zero seropositivity of HIV among donors can be explained by strict donor selection criteria followed at our blood bank and paid/professional donors posing as RD were identified and excluded from the study.
Prevalence of HCV in the present study was 1.41% which is higher as compared to other studies from different part of India which reported the prevalence of HCV varying from 0.09% to 0.9%.,,,,,, Yadav et al. reported that wide variations of HCV seroprevalence reported by several studies from India might be due to variable sensitivity and specificity of different ELISA kits used for testing.
In the present study, prevalence of syphilis was 0.82% which is comparable to studies from North India by Arya et al. (0.89%) and Kaur et al. (0.7%) while it is higher as compared to studies by Awasthi et al. (0.13%) from North India, Patel et al. (0.25%) and Shah et al. (0.23%) from Western India, Khamankar et al. (0.44%) and Yadav et al. (0.04%) from Central India, and Pallavi et al. (0.28%) from South India.
In the present study, all donors were tested negative for malaria which is comparable to studies done by Yadav et al. and Pallavi et al. Studies from North India by Awasthi et al. and Arya et al. reported its prevalence to be 0.04% to 0.2%. Screening for malaria is easier as compared to other TTIs as donors easily give a history of suffering from malaria and self-defer, since there is no social taboo associated with it.
Comparison of prevalence of transfusion-transmissible infections among voluntary and replacement donors
In the present study, seropositivity for HIV among both voluntary and RD was zero. Makroo et al. found no significant difference in the prevalence HIV among voluntary and RD. Statistically significant higher prevalence of HIV among RD was reported by Arya et al., Patel et al., and Shah et al. While Khamankar et al. found higher prevalence of HIV among voluntary donors as compared to RD.
In the present study, prevalence of HBV among RD was significantly higher (P = 0.0021) as compared to voluntary donors. Similar finding was reported by Makroo et al., Patel et al., and Arya et al. Studies by Shah et al. and Pallavi et al. also reported increased seropositivity of HBV in RD but data on P value was not provided. While Khamankar et al. found higher prevalence of HBV among RD which was not statistically significant.
In the present study, prevalence of HCV and syphilis was higher in RD but P value could not be derived. Studies by Makroo et al. and Arya et al. reported statistically significant (P< 0.05) higher prevalence of HCV in RD, whereas Patel et al. reported higher prevalence of HCV among RD which was not statistically significant. Higher prevalence of HCV among RD was also reported by Khamankar et al. and Pallavi et al. but P value was not provided.
Studies by Makroo et al., Patel et al., and Arya et al. reported higher prevalence of syphilis among RD which was statistically significant (P< 0.05). Studies by Kaur et al., Shah et al., Khamankar et al., and Pallavi et al. also reported higher prevalence of syphilis in RD but data on P value was not provided.
In the present study, all donors in both categories were negative for malaria. Similar finding was reported by Pallavi et al. In a study by Arya et al., no statistically significant difference was found in the prevalence of malaria among voluntary and RD.
Studies from neighboring developing countries of Nepal, Bangladesh, and Pakistan also reported that RD forms a major source of blood supply and they found higher prevalence of TTI among RD.,,
| Conclusion|| |
Thus, in the present study, total number of RD was significantly higher and prevalence of HBV, HCV, and syphilis was among them was higher as compared to first-time voluntary donors. All donors were seronegative for HIV which is a unique finding in the present study. Major limitation of the present study was less number of data collected during the study period. In developing countries where blood transfusion services are mainly hospital based, onus of providing blood for transfusion falls on patients' relatives. To provide adequate safe blood for transfusion efforts are required on larger scale such as centralizing blood transfusion services and increasing number of community-based camps. Meanwhile, in hospital-based blood transfusion services where number of RD is significantly higher, efforts should be made to identify healthy RD and they should be motivated to become regular voluntary donors by providing proper donor education and counseling.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Bloch EM, Vermeulen M, Murphy E. Blood transfusion safety in Africa: A literature review of infectious disease and organizational challenges. Transfus Med Rev 2012;26:164-80.
Allain JP, Sarkodie F, Asenso-Mensah K, Owusu-Ofori S. Relative safety of first-time volunteer and replacement donors in West Africa. Transfusion 2010;50:340-3.
Barreto CC, Sabino EC, Gonçalez TT, Laycock ME, Pappalardo BL, Salles NA, et al.
Prevalence, incidence, and residual risk of human immunodeficiency virus among community and replacement first-time blood donors in São Paulo, Brazil. Transfusion 2005;45:1709-14.
Allain JP. Moving on from voluntary non-remunerated donors: Who is the best blood donor? Br J Haematol 2011;154:763-9.
Makroo RN, Hegde V, Chowdhry M, Bhatia A, Rosamma NL. Seroprevalence of infectious markers & their trends in blood donors in a hospital based blood bank in north India. Indian J Med Res 2015;142:317-22.
] [Full text]
Yadav BS, Varma AV, Singh P, Kumar R, Bandi PK. Seroprevalence of transfusion-transmitted infections (TTIs) in blood donors: A study from central India. Int J Med Sci Public Health 2016;5:1158-62.
Chattoraj A, Behl R, Kataria VK. Infectious disease markers in blood donors. Med J Armed Forces India 2008;64:33-5.
Awasthi S, Singh V, Dutta S, Agarwal D, Ansari M, Arathi N. Prevalence of the blood borne infections in blood donors – Our experience in a tertiary teaching hospital in North India. Internet J Pathol 2010;12.
Progress Report on the Global Safe Blood Initiative and Plan of Action for 2005-2010. CE136/15 136th Session of the Executive Committee. Washington DC, Pan American Health Organization/ WHO Regional Offi ce for the Americas; 2005. Available from: http://www. 1.paho.org/English/gov/ce/ce136-15-e.pdf
. [Last accessed on 2017 Mar 22].
Patel SV, Popat CN, Mazumdar VS, Shah MB, Shringarpure K, Mehta KG, et al
. Seroprevalence of HIV, HBV, HCV and syphilis in blood donors at a tertiary hospital (blood bank) in Vadodara. Int J Med Sci Public Health 2013;2:747-50.
Nanu A, Sharma SP, Chatterjee K, Jyoti P. Markers for transfusion-transmissible infections in North Indian voluntary and replacement blood donors: Prevalence and trends 1989-1996. Vox Sang 1997;73:70-3.
Singh B, Verma M, Kotru M, Verma K, Batra M. Prevalence of HIV and VDRL seropositivity in blood donors of Delhi. Indian J Med Res 2005;122:234-6.
Arya DR, Mahawar NL, Pachaury R, Bharti A, Sharma L, Kumar H, et al
. Seroprevalence of transfusion transmitted infections among blood donors at a tertiary care hospital blood bank in North India. Indian J Health Sci 2016;9:77-81.
Shah N, Shah JM, Jhaveri P, Patel K, Shah CK, Shah NR. Seroprevalence of HBV, HCV, HIV and syphilis among blood donors at a tertiary care teaching hospital in Western India. Gujarat Med J 2013;68:35-9.
Khamankar ST, Hiwale KM, Bhagat VM, Bhake AS. Seroprevalence of transfusion transmitted infection and utility of blood units in a tertiary care hospital in central India. Indian J Basic Appl Med Res 2014;4:7-13.
Prados Madrona D, Fernández Herrera MD, Prados Jiménez D, Gómez Giraldo S, Robles Campos R. Women as whole blood donors: Offers, donations and deferrals in the province of Huelva, South-Western Spain. Blood Transfus 2014;12 Suppl 1:S11-20.
Bani M, Giussani B. Gender differences in giving blood: A review of the literature. Blood Transfus 2010;8:278-87.
Nguyen DD, Devita DA, Hirschler NV, Murphy EL. Blood donor satisfaction and intention of future donation. Transfusion 2008;48:742-8.
Bahadur S, Pujani M, Jain M. Donor deferral due to anemia: A tertiary care center-based study. Asian J Transfus Sci 2011;5:53-5.
] [Full text]
Kaur G, Basu S, Kaur R, Kaur P, Garg S. Patterns of infections among blood donors in a tertiary care centre: A retrospective study. Natl Med J India 2010;23:147-9.
Pallavi P, Ganesh CK, Jayshree K, Manjunath GV. Seroprevalence and trends in transfusion transmitted infections among blood donors in a university hospital blood bank: A 5 year study. Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus 2011;27:1-6.
Shrestha AC, Ghimire P, Tiwari BR, Rajkarnikar M. Transfusion-transmissible infections among blood donors in Kathmandu, Nepal. J Infect Dev Ctries 2009;3:794-7.
Ahmed MU, Begum HA, Hossain T, Chakraborty P. Incidence of common transfusion transmitted disease among blood donors. J Armed Forces Med Coll Bangladesh 2009;5:4-6.
Irfan SM, Uddin J, Zaheer HA, Sultan S, Baig A. Trends in transfusion transmitted infections among replacement blood donors in Karachi, Pakistan. Turk J Haematol 2013;30:163-7.
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]